(+91) 6393287708
Transport Nagar, Kanpur, UP (208023), IN
Mon-Sun 10:00 AM - 07:00 PM


February 24, 2024by canonsphere0
WhatsApp Image 2024-03-11 at 19.11.34_8be40adb

This blog is written by Sagili Bhavana Shree, a 2nd year student at Damodaram Sanjivayya National University.


The Arbitration and Conciliation Act stands as a crucial element of legislation offering an alternative and effective mechanism for resolving conflicts outside the traditional judicial framework. This statute oversees the procedures of arbitration and conciliation, providing an avenue for involved parties to address their disagreements in a more adaptable, private, and less formal setting. The primary objectives of the Act encompass streamlining the process of resolving disputes, enhancing the enforceability of arbitration decisions, and cultivating a conducive environment for investments and business dealings. Enacted with the aim of expediting and facilitating efficient conflict resolution, the Act endeavors to harmonize the parties’ freedom in shaping their dispute resolution mechanism while ensuring procedural equity and efficiency are upheld.


In response to India’s pressing need for a contemporary and efficient mechanism to resolve conflicts, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 emerged. Prior to the enactment of this pivotal statute, the outdated Arbitration Act of 1940 governed arbitration and conciliation processes, plagued by procedural complexities and unwarranted judicial intervention. This led to protracted and cumbersome resolution procedures, dissuading the adoption of arbitration and impeding the growth of international trade and commerce.

Recognizing the shortcomings of the existing legal framework, India endeavored to harmonize its practices with global norms and foster a more conducive environment for alternative dispute resolution. The formulation of the 1996 Act aimed to address these concerns, taking inspiration from international models such as the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.


 At its core, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act strives to create a contemporary and efficient legal structure for the realms of arbitration and conciliation. This legislation is crafted with the overarching objective of fostering a modernized environment that champions arbitration, curtails excessive judicial involvement, and stimulates the expeditious settlement of conflicts. By furnishing a dependable avenue, the law endeavors to equip parties with a reliable mechanism for resolving disputes.

The Act stands as a testament to its commitment by providing a comprehensive framework catering to both local and international arbitration scenarios. This inclusivity not only augments legal lucidity but also bolsters the confidence of investors. Through its meticulously designed provisions, the law aspires to instill a pro-arbitration ethos, reinforcing the notion that disputes can be best addressed outside the courtroom setting. By streamlining procedures and diminishing undue interference, the legislation endeavors to ensure the swift and effective resolution of disputes. In essence, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act embodies a visionary stride towards modernizing dispute resolution mechanisms, underpinning fairness, efficacy, and investor certainty.


1Mechanism for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) – SECTION 89Provides a framework for resolving disputes through arbitration. 
2Appointment of ArbitratorsSECTION 11Details the process for appointing Arbitrators to resolve disputes. 
3Conduct of Arbitration proceedings – SECTION 31Sets out the procedures and conduct for arbitration proceedings. 
4Enforcement of Arbitral Awards – SECTION 36Specifies the process for enforcing arbitral Awards & making them binding on the parties.
5Arbitrability of Disputes – SECTION 8 OR SECTION 11Determines which disputes are capable of being resolved through Arbitration. 
6Challenge of Arbitral Awards – SECTION 34Specifies the grounds on which a party can challenge an arbitral award.


1Contempt of court Parties failing to comply with the orders of the arbitral tribunal or court may face contempt proceedings. 
2Financial Consequences Non – Compilance with arbitration process may result in financial penalties such as paying cost or damages. 
3Enforcement of Awards Failure to enforce arbitral Awards may lead to legal actions for enforcement, including possible penalties. 
4Breach of Arbitration Agreement Parties breaching arbitration agreements may be liable for damages or other legal consequences. 


 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act has brought about a transformation in India’s dispute resolution landscape. Its significance can be understood through several key aspects:

  1. Efficiency: The Act promotes quicker and cost-effective resolution of disputes, reducing the burden on overloaded court systems.
  2. Enforceability: By giving arbitral awards the status of court judgments, the Act enhances the enforceability of awards both domestically and internationally.
  3. Business Confidence: The Act creates confidence in investors and businesses by offering a reliable and neutral mechanism for resolving disputes.
  4. Preservation of Relationships: Arbitration and conciliation focus on preserving business relationships, as opposed to adversarial litigation that can strain interactions between parties.
  5. Flexibility: Parties have the autonomy to shape the arbitration process, choosing procedures and rules that suit their needs and preferences.


  • Timely Disposal: Expedited procedures for certain types of disputes could be introduced to ensure faster resolution. While arbitration is generally faster than traditional litigation, there’s room to expedite the process further. Delays in arbitration can arise due to various factors like frequent adjournments, procedural complexities, and a lack of clear timelines for different stages. Introducing stricter timelines for different phases of arbitration, along with provisions to discourage unnecessary adjournments, can help expedite the process.
  • Qualification of Arbitrators: Establishing clear criteria for arbitrator qualifications can enhance the quality of arbitration panels. Ensuring arbitrators possess the requisite expertise. The competence and impartiality of arbitrators are crucial for the credibility of the process. Establishing minimum qualifications, experience, and ethical standards for arbitrators can enhance their quality. Additionally, maintaining a roster of qualified arbitrators can facilitate efficient appointments.
  • Challenges to AwardsThe grounds for challenging arbitral awards need further clarity to avoid unnecessary and prolonged litigation. Providing clearer guidelines for challenging awards on substantial questions of law, establishing a higher threshold for such challenges, and introducing time limits for filing challenges would ensure that awards are only challenged for legitimate reasons. This would discourage parties from attempting to re-litigate the merits of the case through the arbitration challenge process and reduce the burden on the courts.
  • Consistency in Judicial PronouncementsInconsistent interpretations of the Act’s provisions by different courts can create confusion and uncertainty. Establishing specialized arbitration benches or courts could ensure that decisions related to arbitration are rendered by judges with expertise in the field, leading to more consistent and predictable outcomes. This would enhance the predictability of arbitration-related decisions, fostering confidence in the arbitration process.


The Arbitration and Conciliation Act is a cornerstone of India’s legal framework, modernizing the dispute resolution process and aligning it with international standards. The Act’s objective of facilitating efficient, confidential, and enforceable resolution of disputes contributes to a conducive business environment and increased investor confidence. While the law has had a significant positive impact, periodic revisions and improvements will be crucial to address emerging challenges and ensure that arbitration remains a preferred method of resolving disputes in India.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Lawyered